🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable debates in other member states